The Ontological Argument

Download or Read eBook The Ontological Argument PDF written by Jonathan Barnes and published by Springer. This book was released on 1972-06-18 with total page 105 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle.

Author	: Jonathan Barnes
Publisher	: Springer
Total Pages	: 105
Release	: 1972-06-18
ISBN-10	: 9781349007738
ISBN-13	: 1349007730
Rating	: 4/5 (38 Downloads)

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Book Synopsis The Ontological Argument by : Jonathan Barnes

Book excerpt:

The Ontological Argument Related Books

Language: en
Pages: 105

The Ontological Argument

Authors: Jonathan Barnes

Categories: Philosophy

Type: BOOK - Published: 1972-06-18 - Publisher: Springer

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Language: en
Pages: 82

Understanding Anselm's Ontological Argument

Authors: Guy Jackson

Categories: Philosophy

Type: BOOK - Published: 2023-09-25 - Publisher: Springer Nature

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Anselm's ontological argument is one of the most fascinating, most controversial, and most misunderstood arguments in the entire history of Western thought. By

Language: en
Pages: 262

The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel

Authors: Kevin J. Harrelson

Categories: Philosophy

Type: BOOK - Published: 2009 - Publisher: Humanities Press International

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The ontological argument for the existence of God has been a constant in the philosophy of religion since its first formulation by Anselm of Canterbury in the 1

Language: en
Pages: 250

Anselm’s Other Argument

Authors: Arthur David Smith

Categories: Biography & Autobiography

Type: BOOK - Published: 2014-03-10 - Publisher: Harvard University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Some commentators claim that Anselm’s writings contain a second independent “modal ontological argument” for God’s existence. A. D. Smith contends that

Language: en
Pages: 332

Anselm's Argument

Authors: Brian Leftow

Categories: God

Type: BOOK - Published: 2022 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"Anselm of Canterbury gave the first modal "ontological" argument for God's existence. Yet, despite its distinct originality, philosophers have mostly avoided t